The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
- ALTERSTEVE
- Isolated
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:45 pm
- Location: Utah
The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
I'll be voting for Romney this year, not necessarily because I want him to win but because I want Obama out of office. I like Obama as a person and I think he's a smart and charismatic guy, but I think he's failed as president and in my opinion Romney will do a much better job. And I'm neither a Republican nor a Democrat; I vote for the candidate, not the party they belong to.
If you're not an American, please feel free to select who you would vote for if you were. I have enabled you to change your vote in this poll if you change your mind.
Enjoy the discussion, but since this is a thread about politics, please keep it respectful.
If you're not an American, please feel free to select who you would vote for if you were. I have enabled you to change your vote in this poll if you change your mind.
Enjoy the discussion, but since this is a thread about politics, please keep it respectful.
-
- TABN.com Citizen
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 6:59 am
Re: The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
I feel the same way. I feel like all that Obama has done well in his presidency has been filling out march madness brackets. I'd much rather have a guy who knows what it takes to actually create a job (Romney in private sector) than a career politician who speaks well but does nothing.
Re: The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
Gobama!
Should also note that I'm not American.
Should also note that I'm not American.
For all of the hope that it brings...
Re: The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
I'll be voting Romney for the same reasons as mentioned above.
-
- Hardcore TABN'er
- Posts: 647
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:00 am
- Location: New Jersey
- Contact:
Re: The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
I'd vote for Obama on here but the poll closed up already. Romney seems to be too much of a misogynist for me to like him. I'm also ecstatic that President Obama supports gay marriage, too, so he definitely gets my vote.
Re: The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
Obama without a doubt.
gbruin wrote:Everything Nick says is true. Even when he disagrees with me. Then it's extra true.
- NytestrykerZ
- Hardcore TABN'er
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:00 am
- Location: Halifax, NS
- Contact:
Re: The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
I have decided to stop voting until there is actually someone I want to vote for.
Re: The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
^I'm not sure how much a strategy like that helps. Many people already don't vote so taking a stand against the current options doesn't actually appear to mean anything. It just looks like another person joined the ranks of normal non-voters. Even if it's a choice between the lesser of two evils, the power to vote doesn't seem to me something to be shirked.
gbruin wrote:Everything Nick says is true. Even when he disagrees with me. Then it's extra true.
Re: The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
Please tell me you're voting for him for more than just that.Jaded Rescue wrote:I'd vote for Obama on here but the poll closed up already. Romney seems to be too much of a misogynist for me to like him. I'm also ecstatic that President Obama supports gay marriage, too, so he definitely gets my vote.
Photobucket cash grab.
- TenaciousBe
- On The Rail
- Posts: 1782
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 5:04 pm
- Location: Iowa, USA
- Contact:
Re: The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
I hesitate to get into much of a political debate, but I'll just say I'm still voting for President Obama for many of the same reasons I voted for him 4 years ago, as well as the majority of the policies and stances he's taken on since then.
That, and I can't understand how ANYBODY can look at Mitt Romney and think "there's a good candidate for President."
I'd prefer it if the "lower-tier" candidates got as much time and publicity as these two, but right now, the reality is these are our two options. And between the two, it's not even close.
That, and I can't understand how ANYBODY can look at Mitt Romney and think "there's a good candidate for President."
I'd prefer it if the "lower-tier" candidates got as much time and publicity as these two, but right now, the reality is these are our two options. And between the two, it's not even close.
Re: The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
I agree here. I mean, it's your right to decide not to vote at all, but people that want things to change need to voice their opinions.Nick wrote:^I'm not sure how much a strategy like that helps. Many people already don't vote so taking a stand against the current options doesn't actually appear to mean anything. It just looks like another person joined the ranks of normal non-voters. Even if it's a choice between the lesser of two evils, the power to vote doesn't seem to me something to be shirked.
Photobucket cash grab.
Re: The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
The debates were quite an eye-opener - in one of the worst fields of candidates possibly ever assembled, he still struggled heavily. Unless he ups his game by quite a lot, Obama will take him to the cleaners once campaigning really gets under way.TenaciousBe wrote:That, and I can't understand how ANYBODY can look at Mitt Romney and think "there's a good candidate for President."
For all of the hope that it brings...
-
- Loyal Follower
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2012 8:16 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Re: The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
Vaux, the best way to register your discontent is by going to the polling station and invalidating your vote. Even though the vote doesn't count in the final reckoning just like not going to the polls, you still go there and someone counts your vote as void. I'm a firm believer that No Candidate should be a valid option just like the other candidates, and that if No Candidate wins, there should be a new 6 week campaign with new candidates.
Re: The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
I didn't like Romney's campaign 4 years ago and not much has changed. But I don't care much for Obama either. I'll see you guys in 2016 lol.
Seems like our voting system is set up to where the common person's vote makes no difference until there's 2 people left. Would be nice if I felt like I had more of a voice in choosing the candidate for my voting party.
Seems like our voting system is set up to where the common person's vote makes no difference until there's 2 people left. Would be nice if I felt like I had more of a voice in choosing the candidate for my voting party.
anguyen92 wrote:Oh well. Deal with it.
Re: The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
Do American parties and candidates put out manifestos like the parties in UK politics do over here?
One thing that surprised me in our last election was how few people actually even bothered to read the manifestos and policies before deciding who to vote for.
One thing that surprised me in our last election was how few people actually even bothered to read the manifestos and policies before deciding who to vote for.
Re: The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
I look at it the other way. If enough people decided not to vote instead of just picking between the two puppets that are picked for us, maybe something would actually change. Instead it will just be more of the same, as it always is.Nick wrote:^I'm not sure how much a strategy like that helps. Many people already don't vote so taking a stand against the current options doesn't actually appear to mean anything. It just looks like another person joined the ranks of normal non-voters. Even if it's a choice between the lesser of two evils, the power to vote doesn't seem to me something to be shirked.
At least nobody can blame me when these politicians do something, I didn't put them there, you did.
Re: The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
The part I highlighted is my biggest gripe too...the common person doesn't have much say in this country until it's down to 2 candidates.Vaux wrote:I look at it the other way. If enough people decided not to vote instead of just picking between the two puppets that are picked for us, maybe something would actually change. Instead it will just be more of the same, as it always is.Nick wrote:^I'm not sure how much a strategy like that helps. Many people already don't vote so taking a stand against the current options doesn't actually appear to mean anything. It just looks like another person joined the ranks of normal non-voters. Even if it's a choice between the lesser of two evils, the power to vote doesn't seem to me something to be shirked.
At least nobody can blame me when these politicians do something, I didn't put them there, you did.
anguyen92 wrote:Oh well. Deal with it.
Re: The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
Sounds like a plan, perhaps I will do that. Thanks, and I like that No Candidate option.Der_Metzgermeister wrote:Vaux, the best way to register your discontent is by going to the polling station and invalidating your vote. Even though the vote doesn't count in the final reckoning just like not going to the polls, you still go there and someone counts your vote as void. I'm a firm believer that No Candidate should be a valid option just like the other candidates, and that if No Candidate wins, there should be a new 6 week campaign with new candidates.
Re: The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
Huh I didn't notice Der_Metzgermeister's post for some reason lol. Not a bad idea really...I honestly don't think either candidate is the best our country can do. I'd be really interested to see how many people would mark "none of the above" if it were an option to punch on the card.
anguyen92 wrote:Oh well. Deal with it.